Home › Forums › EB: Field Life › Communication: Servanthood, Print Media, and Security
-
Communication: Servanthood, Print Media, and Security
Posted by ECO on September 9, 2023 at 1:07 pmWhat did you learn from reading some of Quentin Schultze’s book? And finally, what surprised you about Equipping Beyond’s security protocols?
Jaylen replied 2 weeks, 1 day ago 2 Members · 1 Reply -
1 Reply
-
Reading through “An Essential Guide to Interpersonal Communications” had me thinking a lot about communication. I believe certain aspects of communication are my strong suit, and certain aspects of communication are my weakness. I feel that I am good at writing, and therefore emails, texts, newsletters, written stories, etc. will be very well communicated. By that I mean I can grip a reader and paint a full and accurate picture of what I’m trying to communicate.
My weakness with communication is listening. A lot of this is due to my “ADHD”, and some is due to a muscle that I could grow. I feel this book was a little bit insensitive towards people who might have some legitimate hindrances when it comes to listening or even communicating. But with listening, some of the advice the author wrote is simply something that I can’t do, and I don’t think it’s wrong to acknowledge legitimate limitations. On the other hand, there are certain parts of listening well that I can grow on, and I must also be careful not to fall on the other end of the spectrum and tell myself I can’t improve at all because of my struggles with ADHD. I believe there is a happy medium there for sure.As for the Beyond policies, the one that surprised me the most was Living Security. Some of it just seemed to edge on the side of paranoia rather than logical measures. Of course, it depends on where you’re living, but checking your bags- for what I assume the protocol is referring to “bugs/mics” -seems a little unrealistic. I think this is more of a thing that happens in the movies and is one of those things that you might expect to happen but in reality, is not the way a High Tech Threat or Governmental Threat would choose to take you down if they wanted to.
Otherwise, all the stuff seemed pretty common knowledge or reasonable.
Log in to reply.