Indigenous churches are defined as self-supporting, self-governing, and self-propagating. If a church has never self-propagated (planted another church) is it an indigenous church? Why or Why not?
Base on the information it has not meet the requirements to be categorized as indigenous church. It has not grown to be able to able to multiple itself. Being able to duplicate your self need strategy.
I church that has never self-propagated cannot be an indigenous church as by definition they are meant to reproduce. A sign of a thriving church is one that grows beyond its walls and plants a new church, not only to reach new congregants, but raise up a new set of leaders
Deleted User
Deleted User
September 13, 2024 at 5:10 pm
In the definition spoken about in this prompt, the church in question would not be an Indigenous church. It is lacking the element of self-propogating or planting another church. Self-propogating is an important step in Christian ministry of churches as it enables more people to hear the gospel instead of just the members in the specific church.
Please note:
This action will also remove this member from your connections and send a report to the site admin.
Please allow a few minutes for this process to complete.