Home Forums Legacy of ACOP 4.3 ACOP Global Mission’s Strategy

  • 4.3 ACOP Global Mission’s Strategy

    Posted by ECO on August 23, 2021 at 11:36 am

    Jerry & Brenda talked about two different strategies for missions. One was an “addition strategy” the other was a “multiplication strategy”.  Discuss the difference between these two strategies and state reasons why one is preferred over the other. 

    Lorna Anne replied 1 month ago 15 Members · 16 Replies
  • 16 Replies
  • Curtis

    Member
    September 3, 2021 at 11:13 pm
    Rank: Level 2

    multiplication strategy”. preferred over the other. the addition strategy is to make one disciple at a time this takes a lot of time is slow as the multiplication strategy makes a disciplers who makes more disciplers

  • Karry (Karen)

    Member
    December 28, 2021 at 3:20 pm
    Rank: Level 2

    Multiplication is far better as many times Jesus says go into the nations – well we are not one person – but if we can make disciplers – by equipping people – far more people can be reached – just giving a person the tools so right where they are at they can reach more communities in their area – And being from that area that will have an understanding of the needs of the people and maybe how better to reach the lost in that area.

  • Jenn

    Member
    March 20, 2022 at 10:21 pm
    Rank: Level 1

    By looking to disciple a “discipler”, you are exponentially increasing the gospel. Like a pyramid scheme but in a good way lol! If all of us could share the gospel and make four people into a “discipler”, so many more people could be reached for the kingdom.

  • Charla

    Member
    March 26, 2022 at 4:38 pm
    Rank: Level 1

    The “addition strategy” is a one at a time approach that does bring people into the kingdom but slowly. Those new believers are not equipped or encouraged to be disciple makers so the Gospel does not get passed on. The “multiplication strategy” is exponential in it’s growth as you make disciples who make disciples who make disciples… New believers are commissioned to share the Gospel and the Gospel spreads!

    • ECO

      Administrator
      March 30, 2022 at 4:10 pm
      Rank: Level 2

      According to this logic, we don’t count ourselves successful as disciple-makers unless there are multiple generations of believers flowing from the person whom we led to the Lord. This is the essence of disciple-making movements, which is very popular in modern missiology. It is fantastic in theory, but very rarely the standard for success in a North American ministry context. Why do you think this is so?

      • Micah

        Member
        October 4, 2022 at 12:00 pm
        Rank: Level 1

        I think the biggest reason why is because it is incredibly difficult for a movement to be established. It requires high buy-in and people that are sold out for Jesus, setting aside their dignity and image to further the mission of Jesus. I also think that our individualistic and comfortable culture affects this, as we see a handful of people doing full-time missions work and think “they’re doing it, why would I need to do it?”

        I also think our standard of success is often sustainability. This is not bad. However, it can slow down movements if we are set on sustainability alone, preventing us from passing trust and leadership to new disciples in order for them to make disciples; we like to invite people into a steady church rather than send them out to make disciples.

Page 1 of 4

Log in to reply.